Compare Page

Understandability

Characteristic Name: Understandability
Dimension: Usability and Interpretability
Description: The data is understandable
Granularity: Information object
Implementation Type: Process-based approach
Characteristic Type: Usage

Verification Metric:

The number of tasks failed or under performed due to the lack of understandability of data
The number of complaints received due to the lack of understandability of data

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Ensure that appropriate signs/language is used to strenthen the readers understanding about the information object (1) Poor, good, excellent is more suitable than 1, 2,3 as ratings to compare two factors
Avoid any possibility of ambiguity in understanding data with the inclusion of footnotes, legend etc. (1) Footnote : Total price includes GST.
Provide supplements to understand the content of non-text and non-numeral information (e.g.. Images) (1) A location in a plan can be identified by the coordinates
Ensure that data are concisely represented without being overwhelmed (1) Focussed on one topic
Convenient and user friendly (more natural) formats are used for structured attributes like dates, time, telephone number, tax ID number, product code, and currency amounts (1) U.S. phone number formats [+1(555)999-1234]
Appropriate fonts and styles are used to improve the clarity of the content (1) Headings are marked in bold letters, Totals figures are are marked with bold numbers

Validation Metric:

How mature is the process to maintain the understandability of data

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
a Social Security number must consist of nine numeric digits. If this is your only definition, you will find that all values that are blank, contain characters other than numeric or contain less than or more than nine digits. However, you can go further in your definition. The government employs a scheme of assigning numbers that allows you to examine the value in more detail to determine if it is valid or not. Using the larger rule has the potential for finding more inaccurate values. J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
The data element is used only for its intended purpose, that is, the degree to which the data characteristics are well understood and correctly utilized. B. BYRNE, J. K., D. MCCARTY, G. SAUTER, H. SMITH, P WORCESTER 2008. The information perspective of SOA design Part 6:The value of applying the data quality analysis pattern in SOA. IBM corporation.
1) Periodic Reports, such as Financial Statements, Annual Reports, and Policy and Procedure Manuals should have a standard format with a style sheet that presents the information in a consistent and easily read and understood format.

2) The Characteristic in which Information is presented in a way that clearly communicates the truth of the data. Information is presented with clear labels, footnotes, and/or other explanatory notes, with references or links to definitions or documentation the clearly communicates the meaning and any anomalies in the Information.

ENGLISH, L. P. 2009. Information quality applied: Best practices for improving business information, processes and systems, Wiley Publishing.
Usability of data refers to the extent to which data can be accessed and understood. HIQA 2011. International Review of Data Quality Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Ireland. http://www.hiqa.ie/press-release/2011-04-28-international-review-data-quality.
A good presentation provides the user with everything required for the correct interpretation of information. When there is any possibility of ambiguity, a key or legend should be included. LOSHIN, D. 2001. Enterprise knowledge management: The data quality approach, Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
Is the information understandable or comprehensible to the target group? LOSHIN, D. 2006. Monitoring Data quality Performance using Data Quality Metrics. Informatica Corporation.
1) The extent to which the content of an object is focused on one topic.

2) The extent of cognitive complexity of an information object measured by some index or indices.

3) The extent to which the model or schema and content of an information object are expressed by conventional, typified terms and forms according to some general-purpose reference source.

STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733.
1) Data are compactly represented without being overwhelmed.

2) Data are clear without ambiguity and easily comprehended.

WANG, R. Y. & STRONG, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33.

 

Ease of data access

Characteristic Name: Ease of data access
Dimension: Availability and Accessability
Description: Data should be easily accessible in a form that is suitable for its intended use.
Granularity: Information object
Implementation Type: Process-based approach
Characteristic Type: Usage

Verification Metric:

The number of tasks failed or under performed due to lack of ease in data access
The number of complaints received due to lack of ease in data access

GuidelinesExamplesDefinitons

The implementation guidelines are guidelines to follow in regard to the characteristic. The scenarios are examples of the implementation

Guidelines: Scenario:
Routinely accessed information to continue operations, should be automatically delivered to stakeholders online without wasting their time to search for it. (1) Daily exchange rates are linked into the accounting application or maintained in a dash board on the accountants desktop.

(2) Production efficiency is made available on a display board in the production floor.

Information needed for management reporting purposes should be identified and catered through built in reports where the users do not have to create the reports themselves. (1) Order status is frequently searched information by different stake holder groups and hence a report is made available with multiple searching criteria.
Facilitate users by providing tools to query the database without using any specific technical knowledge and perform business analytics to bring innovation (1) Technical infrastructure supports the users to develop their own reports based on dynamic information needs without consulting technical staff.
Facilitate the user to filter the relevant information depending on the need. (1) Sales report with filtering criteria for customer and date range.
The interfaces and reports should be created conveniently the users do not have to write complex queries or further process information before usage. (1) Product prices are ordered as per "Relevance" or "Price" to enable an e-commerce customer on a purchase decision

Validation Metric:

How mature is the process of maintaining ease in data access

These are examples of how the characteristic might occur in a database.

Example: Source:
Consider a database containing orders from customers. A practice for handling complaints and returns is to create an “adjustment” order for backing out the original order and then writing a new order for the corrected information if applicable. This procedure assigns new order numbers to the adjustment and replacement orders. For the accounting department, this is a high-quality database. All of the numbers come out in the wash. For a business analyst trying to determine trends in growth of orders by region, this is a poor-quality database. If the business analyst assumes that each order number represents a distinct order, his analysis will be all wrong. Someone needs to explain the practice and the methods necessary to unravel the data to get to the real numbers (if that is even possible after the fact). J. E. Olson, “Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 9 January 2003.

The Definitions are examples of the characteristic that appear in the sources provided.

Definition: Source:
Accessibility refers to the physical conditions in which users can obtain data Clarity refers to the data’s information environment including appropriate metadata. LYON, M. 2008. Assessing Data Quality ,
Monetary and Financial Statistics.
Bank of England. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/
statistics/Documents/ms/articles/art1mar08.pdf.
Speed and ease of locating and obtaining an information object relative to a particular activity STVILIA, B., GASSER, L., TWIDALE, M. B. & SMITH, L. C. 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1720-1733.
Data are available or easily or quickly retrieved. WANG, R. Y. & STRONG, D. M. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 5-33.